Yet this is what the public has been lead to believe is the case.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Very interesting.
I would propose a Constitutional Amendment that declares that only SCOTUS decisions in super-majority, similarly as is required of Congress, would be precedent binding. Decisions less than super-majority would bind only the specific litigants.
If CA, NY, NJ, CT, CO, WA, OR, and DC can IGNORE the Heller and McDonald decisions, then by the strength of God we should deny this evil Obergefell ruling.
Put perversion to a public vote.
And that's why the Dred Scott decision is still revered as Settled Law.
What is needed is a path to over rule Supreme Court. Congress should be able to reject a Supreme Court ruling by simple majority and send a ruling to the states which would immediately suspend the ruling taking effect till the states ratify the ruling using the same requirements as for a Constitutional Amendment. I’d also like for states to be able to initiate the process whereas any ruling could be voided by the states if the number required to pass an amendment nullify the ruling officially.
The public in general and conservatives in particular are also taught obedience at all costs.
If you hand caesar a whip, don’t be surprised when he uses it later to flog you.