Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford
...which restore the Constitution by invoking the Constitution.

Kind of like the Bible being its own best interpreter.

If the Congress of the United States elects to have the ratification procedures conducted by conventions rather than legislatures...

Can the Congress decline to chose a ratification method? I read the word may and desperately wish it were the word must. My read is that they have a way to opt out of the whole process and effectively shut it down.

I hope I'm wrong.

27 posted on 11/13/2015 5:25:16 AM PST by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Tonytitan
The duty of Congress to call a convention of the states upon two thirds seeking it is mandatory.

The option whether the proposed amendment shall be ratified by state legislatures or by state conventions is optional and entirely at the discretion of Congress.

No fair reading of either procedure gives Congress the option not to act but history tells us that Congress has played games with its obligation to call a convention of the states and there does not appear to be an explicit remedy for that breach of duty outlined in the Constitution.

The judicial branch would likely not touch it. However, what would prevent the states themselves from proceeding?

In any event, these obstacles are obstacles toward enacting amendments and most of the criticisms which we confront have to do with a runaway convention, a situation precisely the opposite.


28 posted on 11/13/2015 5:43:16 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson