Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: equaviator

But given the shape, there isn’t much internal room, and that’s my point. Consider how they’ve put conformal tanks on the later F16s.

The YF-23 is a pretty and sleek plane, but there isn’t much volume to it.


14 posted on 11/13/2015 8:07:38 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

I think you’d be surprised. The trapezoidal wings of the YF-23 have a LOT of internal volume dedicated to fuel, and there were big side saddle tanks outboard of the engines. Plus the aircraft’s weapons bay was long but shallow. The “hump” behind the cockpit was mostly a big fuel tank too.

The production F-23 was going to be larger than the YF-23 as well.


16 posted on 11/13/2015 8:17:44 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
Here ya go...


17 posted on 11/13/2015 8:28:09 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson