[BlueDragon]

You keep dragging this garbage (your own reasonings) out further and further. Once one idea or opinion of yours is shown to be less than solid, you go on to the next, as if nothing at all just deflated your last last set of windbaggery poofery contentions.

I think I'm about done with you, for now. There's no need to go chasing after the rabbit, when he's on the run.

But same time tomorrow, or next week maybe?

[eastexsteve]

-- You keep dragging this garbage (your own reasonings) out further and further. Once one idea or opinion of yours is shown to be less than solid, you go on to the next, as if nothing at all just deflated your last last set of windbaggery poofery contentions. I think I'm about done with you, for now. There's no need to go chasing after the rabbit, when he's on the run. But same time tomorrow, or next week maybe?

You claimed an "extenuating circumstance" defense for those bikers pulling guns in the restaurant, saying they feared for their lives. That's a Chapter 9 defense to prosecution under Texas Penal Code 46.035. OK, are they going to claim they feared for their life from being shot by the cops, or being shot by other bikers? Because, I'm willing to bet my nickel that one of these has no chance, and the other has slim to none, and will further hamper the defense of other bikers involved.

And, you can forget about the guy who actually discharged his firearm in the restaurant. Stick a fork in him, he's done.

As more evidence surfaces, we will all know more.