Posted on 11/10/2015 12:54:32 PM PST by twister881
I said they appeared well-researched-I’m aware that his co-author does the research-and I doubt that BOR listens to him-or anyone else-that pompous ass just babbles his opinion, no matter what the subject is-he is king in his own little world...
Mark Levin has alluded to skeletons in O’Reilly’s closet. I remember a few years ago O’Reilly admitted to making an out of court settlement to make a woman go away and stay quiet. O’Reilly is full of himself. I don’t trust him or what he says about Reagan.
Another besides Will is Mark Levin, who actually served in the Reagan administration. Last night he launched a verbal bombast at BOR that was a joy to listen to.
Other historians look for ideas that support their thesis and write from that vantage point. Quite unlike a good detective.
O'Reilly, even though he has his bachelors in history, he must have forgotten his training, or he did not do enough research.
I suspect he wrote his books merely to make money, and that is never a good way to further good history.
When someone writes "history" that is not complete, they are really writing fiction.
So, Bill - just save us all the anguish and just write some novels.
WHO?
Wow, if George Will calls you a fraud, you’ve become Ted Baxter.
>> Were the lungs the seat of wisdom, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly would be wise, but they are not and he is not.
Granted, George Will is a twerp, but that line there is pure wisdom and truth!
With luck, BOR and GW will annihilate each other in this cage match and we’ll all win.
On this one, Will is right.
A pox on both of them. They are using conservatives to make millions and nothing changes for Middle Class families, the bed rock of our country.
That relates to one of the questions that Will raised and O’Reilly didn’t want to answer:
How can you write a book on Reagan without talking to those who were closest to him? (Or visiting the Reagan Library)
And also, if (as O’Reilly claims), it’s a laudatory book about Reagan, then why are the Reaganauts all so critical of it (to the point, O’Reilly also claims, of trying to suppress it)?
The only answer will be to shout at anyone who asks.
Will is an atheist? Where did you get that?
Will was right, O’Reilly was wrong, and as usual, Bill just shouted him down and never gave him a chance to state his case.
I would love to hear what she has to say and find some of the other skeletons.
The entire Fox News Channel is nothing but a book of the month club.
Go Levin!
So George is the bad guy in this? And OReilly is the good guy?
I really don’t give a dam about what you think or feel about anyone on the planet
The question in this is who is right about Ronald Reagan?
And I side with Will on this
He does a good job of laying out his case against the OReilly book
Both are spinning pinheads.
Spinheads for short. lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.