In college, Baker said identified "on the left," and was actually the vice president of the Labour student union, according to How Did They Do It.
1 posted on
11/08/2015 12:22:38 PM PST by
jimbo123
To: All
Why the hell is a foreigner who can't vote moderating this debate?
![](http://www.dagospia.com/img/foto/05-2013/direttore-wall-street-240934.jpg)
2 posted on
11/08/2015 12:24:12 PM PST by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
When has any debate moderator catered to any but demonrat candidates? Should have read Who Won't Cater To Conservative Republican Candidates
3 posted on
11/08/2015 12:26:16 PM PST by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: jimbo123
"He has a strong track record as an economics writer, so he will definitely call the candidates out on economic plans that don't add up."
Since when do the moderators think they are part of the debate? They are there to ask questions, not spar with the candidates. By definition, a "moderator" is not part of the debate. The claims of the candidates can be questioned later on by other commentators.
To: jimbo123
I suppose it is gonna be another dog and pony show.
6 posted on
11/08/2015 12:36:23 PM PST by
crz
To: jimbo123
Why do they need a panel of moderators? Have one person, ask broad based questions, and give every candidate 3 minutes to answer the same question in random order. If the candidates want to challenge each other fine. Save the media interrogation for one on one interviews.
7 posted on
11/08/2015 12:39:30 PM PST by
Hugin
("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man Standing.)
To: jimbo123
8 posted on
11/08/2015 12:42:22 PM PST by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: jimbo123
Moderator “Won’t Cater”= accusatory “When did you stop beating your wife?” loaded questions with a gallery of leering, smirking, lefty media gargoyles egging him on.
9 posted on
11/08/2015 12:45:37 PM PST by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: jimbo123
but what's clear is that he won't be catering to the candidates with right-wing questions that simply allow them to elaborate on their economic policies. Baker's more moderate stance and experience in economics will allow him to challenge the candidates on the feasibility of their plans and hopefully make them sweat a little.
If I was them I'd boycott the Fox debate...They don't need the debate...
Fox even admits their goal is to tear the candidates proposals to pieces...Talk about an agenda...
11 posted on
11/08/2015 1:07:39 PM PST by
Iscool
(Izlam and radical Izlam are different the same way a wolf and a wolf in sheeps clothing are differen)
To: jimbo123
Did we learn nothing? I thought we were going to have moderators from the right? Why keep asking for another hit?
13 posted on
11/08/2015 1:11:27 PM PST by
Yaelle
To: jimbo123
I’m not giving it any ratings. Fox had it’s chance and proved what they are.
To: jimbo123
The debate moderators think they are the ones debating. They think its their job to go after the candidates and expose them.
I don’t know if I’ll bother to watch any more of them. What would be the point?
17 posted on
11/08/2015 3:37:27 PM PST by
marron
To: jimbo123
Gerard Baker, doing the socialist moderating American moderators are just too moderate to do!
What has struck me about the debates so far is that the candidates were cut off when they criticized Hillary.
Seemed like they were only allowed to criticize each other.
Didn’t watch the last one maybe it was different.
18 posted on
11/08/2015 3:59:04 PM PST by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson