Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

“I wish that a better candidate were speaking so clearly the unflinching truth. Well, actually there are two – Jindal and Cruz – but Trump has somehow mastered the Media game as no one else could. Too many people have seen him on TV.”

Jindal, yes.

Cruz refuses to say what he’ll do with the millions of illegals here. He ‘says’ he’s not for amnesty but won’t define what he means by that. McCain also said he wasn’t for amnesty, LOL! Not a good sign, IMO, when other candidates are speaking clearly on the issue. He says he’ll deal with border security first - then ‘have the discussion’ on what to do with the millions of illegals. He says Americans don’t want to have that discussion until the border is dealt with. BS - conservatives want that discussion! so I don’t trust him. He’s not saying because he has something to hide. Maybe his donors’ influence.

Amnesty is anything other than deporting them. if they get to stay here, then they’ve been given amnesty - forgiven for breaking our laws and allowed benefits those waiting in line, filling out forms and paying fees are denied. If allowed to stay, like Carson’s guest worker program, then WE still pay for their kids’ education, health care, food stamps, welfare, etc. And it’s just one small step from there to citizenship and voting for democrats. Once they are given legal status, they are here to stay-along with all their family members.

The only 2 not talking amnesty are Jindal (not doing well in the polls) and Cruz (who isn’t talking at all)

I’ll stick with Trump, who is saying the right things right now.


7 posted on 11/07/2015 10:15:04 AM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CottonBall
You really think that Trump will do what he says?

Candidates make a lot of promises just to get elected and after they are elected they forget their promises.

Thanks but no thanks

You wrote that Cruz says he's not for amnesty but won't define what he means by that>

What is there to define? He's against amnesty not for it.

12 posted on 11/07/2015 10:42:24 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson