This is the right response....
Posted on 11/04/2015 12:08:26 PM PST by ElainaVer
This is the right response....
Trump said NOTHING about legal citizens, what part of ILLEGAL do these people not understand?
These people are probably paid democrat operatives posing as racist ignorant Mexicans.
Trump does want to abolish birthright citizenship.
And what part of CRIMINAL do these people not understand? Dems are releasing criminal alien convicted felons to murder, rob and rape American citizens and legal residents.
Keep it up, illegals, and we’ll have our modern version of Operation Wetback as the first order of business in January 2017.
Drudge has to put this up. You can buy this kind of add.
Trump does want to abolish birthright citizenship, but he has never said he is going to make it retroactive. No one has.
For those with parents who came here illegaly.
Obviously not the English part:-)
Mark my words: the Democrat Party is stirring-up this “waaaah! They’re racists!” sentiment so that they can bring their newly-minted voters en masse to the polls in key swing states next year. These little temper tantrum publicity stunts are going to continue into next year, all the way to Election Day. And if they win both Colorado and Nevada’s electoral votes, Ohio and Florida are afterthoughts.
I hope our candidates call them out on these nasty tactics.
“Trump does want to abolish birthright citizenship.’
He’s not alone.
But it’s debatable how much of an issue it will be. A wall will cut it down to nothing. We’d still have the birth tourism issue, but since the courts have deported US born children with their foreign national parents, it can be managed.
La Raza and firebrand anti-everything American Louis Gutierrez and probably funding from one of George Soros who HATES America will twist Donald Trumps words beyond recognition. Obama's campign used (little children) also...Hitler did the same.......stupid adults, living is a wonderful freedom loving country...this is child abuse.
Trump speaks the truth....
Brainwash the kiddies, get them to use foul words, whatever it takes to push their racism allegations.
Government public schools have been doing the same thing for decades. They’ve been completely infiltrated.
It seems like these kids are being groomed by their parents to play the part of East LA cholos from an early age. Mama y Papi will be so proud when these kids have their first arrest and criminal record.
SO DO I.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Again, thanks to Mark Levin who has pointed out that the congressional record indicates that two federal lawmakers who helped to draft the 14th Amendment had indicated that being born in the USA does not automatically make a person a USA citizen.
"The first amendment is to section one, declaring that ”all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been so fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens [emphases added], who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.” Senator Jacob Howard, Congressional Globe, 1774 - 1875 Congressional Globe, Senate, 39th Congress, 1st Session.
And to clear up any confusion about ”foreigners” and ”aliens” in the excerpt above being used to describe the family members of ambassadors or foreign ministers, the excerpt below is another official perspective on what the 14th Amendments jurisdiction clause means.
"Of course my opinion is not any better than that of any other member of the Senate; but it is very clear to me that there is nothing whatever in the suggestions of the Senator from Wisconsin. The provision is, that ”all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” That means ”subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.” Now, does the Senator from Wisconsin pretend to say that the Navajo Indians are subject to the Complete jurisdiction of the United States? What do we mean by ”subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?” Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means. [emphases added] Can you sue a Navajo Indian in court? Are they in any sense subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States? By no means. We make . . . ” Senator Lyman Trumbull, Congressional Globe, 1774 - 1875 Congressional Globe, Senate, 39th Congress, 1st Session. (See middle of first column.)
The reason that there is so much confusion about the 14th Amendments jurisdiction clause imo, is because activist justices twisted the intentions of the drafters of that amendment when they decided the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark in his favor.
“Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.” - Vladimir Lenin
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.