Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger

She’s a naturalized American citizen. She does not have dual nationality per China’s law.

The problem is that the same is not true for other foreign-born children who are adopted by Americans. Many of them do have dual nationality.

Dual nationality becomes a problem legally when said dual national is in the country of birth and owes allegiance to said country. The U.S. has only a secondary claim under international law.

Think about the Americans in Iranian prisons. We have no power to help them. While it may be far-fetched, imagine an American president is accused of treason while in his country of birth or conscripted or must serve on a jury or whatever forced obligation one can imagine.

We have to draw the line somewhere. Citizenship at birth is (likely) where Congress drew it. The FF were more conservative on the matter.

(I was on my way to sleep. I must stop.)


72 posted on 11/03/2015 11:16:15 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
Dual nationality becomes a problem legally when said dual national is in the country of birth and owes allegiance to said country. The U.S. has only a secondary claim under international law.

Now THAT makes sense.

73 posted on 11/03/2015 11:17:40 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson