Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
Yes, I do. The Founding Fathers, the Supreme Court, and historians have spoken and written at length about the inherent dangers of dual nationality.

Such as? Bear in mind these children DO NOT have dual nationality. As soon as they touch American soil, provided both parents went to China to get them, American citizenship is automatic.

So, while China may not recognize the Chinese citizenship of a child adopted by Americans, other countries do. The inherent dangers of having an American POTUS who has duties and obligations to a foreign country as its citizen while within its borders is obvious.

Not obvious at all, particularly where there is no dual-citizenship. Please elaborate.

That this child feels American or is raised as an American is irrelevant.

Absurd! The defining characteristic to being an American, as opposed to any other nationality, is a set of ideals, not a particular lineage or race. This was eloquently elaborated on by D'Sousa, though in which of his books escapes me at the moment.

Further, it is absurd to think the NBC restriction are an efficacious safeguard against "foreign designs on the Presidency." If there is any clause of the Constitution, aside from those regarding slavery, that has been made obsolete by modernity, the NBC clause is surely it. Countries with nascent plans to subvert the Presidency simply do not work that way any more.

55 posted on 11/03/2015 10:34:17 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry at your responses. It is late. So I cannot provide an extensive response tonight. I will be happy to answer your questions tomorrow. If I forget, which is not unlikely as I am riddled with ADHD, and you want to continue the discussion, please do ping or freepmail me.


59 posted on 11/03/2015 10:42:54 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger
If there is any clause of the Constitution, aside from those regarding slavery, that has been made obsolete by modernity
83 posted on 11/04/2015 1:50:42 AM PST by Darth Reardon (Is it any wonder I'm not the president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger

Certain that Slate, and a huge slate of Democrat socialists would agree with your take.
Are you trying to be provocatively contrary an in your stance?

Barry Obola is a perfect example of foreign country’s influence to install a usurper Commander-in-Chief Executive to do their bidding.
He was born of communists, raised and groomed by communists, schooled and funded by muslims.
His actions in office indicate his obvious treasonous loyalties, ie:
“Tell Vladimir I’ll have more flexibility after the election” and “America has always been a Muslim nation”, etc.
And the nation and the whole free world are paying a terrible price.
Some people cannot see the obvious which stares right in front of them.

RE:” Further, it is absurd to think the NBC restriction are an efficacious safeguard against “foreign designs on the Presidency.” If there is any clause of the Constitution, aside from those regarding slavery, that has been made obsolete by modernity, the NBC clause is surely it. Countries with nascent plans to subvert the Presidency simply do not work that way any more.”


86 posted on 11/04/2015 4:14:32 AM PST by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson