Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator

Wrong. The issue 2 measure was put in place to counteract the monopoly problem. It didn’t get nearly as many yay votes as the pot measure got nay votes. More people were against pot than were against the monopoly problem.


24 posted on 11/03/2015 7:27:22 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

Oh brother. Everyone on Earth but you say something different.


26 posted on 11/03/2015 7:30:13 PM PST by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

There probably was a lot of petitio principii going on, where people educated in years past thought at once about problems generated by pot-dealing associated crime. No dollars were needed to get their reactions, well ingrained.

You would think that Prohibition, if not the Holy Bible, would have taught America that you can never ban a substance abuse problem away. You can put band-aids on it all you like. The problem is not too much pot but too little God.


31 posted on 11/03/2015 7:33:48 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson