Issue 2 passed by a lot less than Issue 3 was rejected by. You had 48% saying they were fine with monopolies but only 36% saying they wanted the pot monopoly.
All 52% who voted against monopolies may have been anti-pot too. It’s up to you to provide evidence otherwise.
As a landowner in Ohio with a creek-front floodplain that I keep wild to retain soil, I know that anything could grow there. As the law now stands, and as confiscation stands with drug indictments, it’s always possible that nature or someone else could grow some pot on my property, and I’d never see it. Never. I avoid the area in the summer due to its being overgrown and full of ticks, mosquitos, etc.
Because of that I would welcome some aspects of pot legalization, but I voted against it because of the monopoly.
Regarding the 52%, it is evident that they were opposed to monopolies being enshrined in our constitution. It’s not really necessary to show anything other than that. Those numbers would have also defeated the pot issue #3.