I'm recommending the guy who said yes to amnesty in 2013, then said no to amnesty in 2014 and now won't comment on it in 2015.
That's slightly better than the guy who wants to amnesty the good ones back in after saying that he wants to deport them out, even though his plan only mentions deporting the bad ones.
So you're going with the GOPe...Kind of a Bush/Romney/Rubio bot...
“That’s slightly better than the guy who wants to amnesty the good ones back in after saying that he wants to deport them out, even though his plan only mentions deporting the bad ones.”
Your depiction of Trump’s position on immigration is simply not true. Go back and research it.
From the get-go, he mentioned a way to allow some of “the good ones” to stay. When he came out with his policy paper on the issue, and got into more specifics, he made it clear that all must go, not just the bad ones, but that “the good ones” would be allowed to get in line to come back in. A much stronger, and more consistent position than Rubio’s. And of course, that doesn’t even take into account the plan to build a wall.
As recently as a month ago Rubio was saying he still supported Amnesty in a speech he gave in Spanish to a pro amnesty group.
Rubio, NEVER!
How is backing someone who won’t say their position on amnesty (Rubio or Cruz) better than one who will deport them all and make them get back in line - BEHIND those trying to get in legally?
It only is if you want amnesty.