Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2015 5:50:18 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: SeekAndFind

The problem with socialists...their economic analyses are static.


27 posted on 11/01/2015 6:19:49 AM PST by Redleg Duke (The Federal Government is nothing but a welfare program with a dress code!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"The Democratic candidates have acknowledged this and have called for high-end tax increases, while keeping proposed tax cuts targeted on low- or middle-income Americans. They have also called for new taxes on financial transactions. Most important, their tax plans are part of broader economic proposals to raise wages, including support for a higher minimum wage, unions, expanded profit-sharing and employee ownership. "

So higher taxes will raise wages...got it
28 posted on 11/01/2015 6:21:37 AM PST by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Like anyone believes the math of the NYT...or anything else.
Hello.....they are journalism majors......


31 posted on 11/01/2015 6:29:56 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
All of these candidates deny fiscal reality. In the next 10 years, revenues will need to increase by 40 percent simply to keep federal spending even...

Then let's not keep federal spending even.

-PJ

32 posted on 11/01/2015 6:31:19 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The NYT has a history of being wrong on so many things.....


33 posted on 11/01/2015 6:33:13 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The Bush family needs to just go away. The Clinton family needs just to go to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

100 percent tax would not be enough for the present runaway government.


34 posted on 11/01/2015 6:39:12 AM PST by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
In the next 10 years, revenues will need to increase by 40 percent simply to keep federal spending even, per capita, with inflation and population growth.

If this is the fiscal program advocated by the New York Times (and by extension Progressives of all stripes), one can quite readily understand why the Republicans are looking for an alternative.

35 posted on 11/01/2015 6:41:00 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The New York Slime says the new tax plans won’t work.

Then where, dear Editor-in-Chief of the NYT, is YOUR proposed tax plan?


37 posted on 11/01/2015 6:50:35 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Flashback:

Obama open to newspaper bailout bill

40 posted on 11/01/2015 6:57:19 AM PST by Timber Rattler ("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

When money gets tight in our house we don’t spend as much. Seems to work nicely.
Why do they always approach it from the view that spending can NEVER be cut?


43 posted on 11/01/2015 7:20:48 AM PST by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
In the next 10 years, revenues will need to increase by 40 percent simply to keep federal spending even, per capita, with inflation and population growth

Why don't we just give them every cent we earn, and they can give us cheese, rice and federal housing apartments.

Oh wait, that's the Democratic Party's plan.

46 posted on 11/01/2015 7:36:03 AM PST by dead ("I'm up to my eyeball in virgin goats!" - Mullah Omar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

LOL! The toads down at the NYT are now tax plan experts. No wonder the country is so screwed up.


47 posted on 11/01/2015 7:39:54 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Have you ever noticed that we don't have a "Battle Hymm of the Democracy"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Once again the assumption is the government has first right to the earnings of the serfs...


48 posted on 11/01/2015 7:53:22 AM PST by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would journalists know more about tax plans than the economists who developed them? This is where this country got off-track, thinking anyone with a megaphone is all-knowing.

They’re lawyers and journalists! They know squat about running a country except how to find ‘expert witnesses’ to put on the stand for their viewpoint.


50 posted on 11/01/2015 12:40:24 PM PST by Kenny (RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson