Posted on 10/31/2015 10:24:53 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Yes, in movies, but it never looks like that. Not as poor quality vid, but also I’ve never seen it that way where the plane clearly is not in one piece but the wings are still attached to the body as the front part aims down.
Exactly and great question!
Stating something, posting a link of someone else saying it, but no proof.... is not evidence.
When you make a claim, then show us the 2003 video.
LOL! That something we learn when were 5 years old.
Again......
Posting a link of someone else saying it, but no proof.... is NOT evidence.
When you make a claim..., then please show us the 2003 video?
LOL! That something we learn when were 5 years old.
I only found it because of your first post.
Good job.
; )
Can you post a direct link to the video, please? I’ve gone through the posted story 5x and can’t find the link.....
I understand that the link provided did not link to a video.
My only claim was that someone provided a link to what they thought was that video from the past.
I’m still working on trying to find evidence the video is not of the Russian plane.
If I find it, I will be sure to show you.
Maybe it was sabotaged before takeoff
The Daily Mail article up on Drudge right now shows that the plane crash-landed at 10,000 feet. Does that change the Manpad possibility?
(And what transgendered person gave “Manpad” its name?)
I do not think Saudi Arabia would do this—One sub (and one is off Syria) could unleash death and destruction to make Saudi Arabia a Historic footnote. Unlike Obama—Putin would do it.
Unfortunately, in neither case are we dealing with rational people.
Not so much.
.
Wrong airplane ... the burned-out aircraft on the ground is a DC-9 ... confirmed by “Wrench” ...
I can’t speak to the other videos ... I saw a video of a missile hitting a plane, but it could have been anything ...
One thing is clear, however, the original Youtube “plane image” released by ISIS this morning is not the Russian airliner.
.
“I’m surprised that some Western power doesn’t just go in an take over Saudi Arabia. It would be easier than defeating Saddam Hussein in the 1st Iraqi war.”
No, it wouldn’t. When we invaded Iraq we were permitted to use Saudi Arabia as a staging area. What nation in the middle east would allow the U.S. - the only “Western power” with enough troops, planes and ships to EVER possibly win a war anywhere in the Middle East - to use it’s soil as a staging area???
Yep someone else just said it with no link.... LOL!
In the meanwhile youtube and other sites are pulling the video.
Why would they pull it if it was from 2003?
Anyway, I guess time time will tell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.