Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blueflag

“Oxygen NEVER “burns” in a chemical reaction.”

Sounds like you are suggesting that the oxygen is just a catalyst. It isn’t so... As in the simplest case of hydrogen and oxygen, both elements are consumed to produce h2o. After the reaction, we neither have oxygen or hydrogen, just water.


26 posted on 10/29/2015 8:36:56 PM PDT by babygene (Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: babygene; Blueflag
Sounds like you are suggesting that the oxygen is just a catalyst. It isn’t so... As in the simplest case of hydrogen and oxygen, both elements are consumed to produce h2o. After the reaction, we neither have oxygen or hydrogen, just water.

Good example, and the standard nomenclature is that hydrogen is being burned, not oxygen. Hydrogen is the fuel, oxygen "the burn". Same in an engine. Fuel is burned, oxygen does it. No one calls it an oxygen engine.

50 posted on 10/30/2015 4:13:40 AM PDT by Moltke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

No. I know better than to suggest oxygen is a mere catalyst. A catalyst is unchanged in a reaction. Oxygen is a reagent in the “burn” process.

Just accept it. The fuel air bomb does not burn the oxygen.


55 posted on 10/30/2015 4:38:36 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson