[editor-surveyor]

You obviously do not understand my comments.

When Congress has encouraged an action to be taken, they cannot legislate a penalty for doing so at a later date.

As for the rest of your comments, they hinge on the folly of a completely unconstitutional rogue court. Contractual obligations are protected by the constitution, even though the court likes to pretend that they are not.
.

[justlurking]

As for the rest of your comments, they hinge on the folly of a completely unconstitutional rogue court.

Take a look at the decision. It was handed down back in 1960.

And regardless of whether you agree with them, it's settled law. It will require a contrary Court decision to vacate it, and historically that's very rare.

[SkyPilot]

When Congress has encouraged an action to be taken, they cannot legislate a penalty for doing so at a later date.

Sure they can. They do it every year when they change the tax code that is twice the size of a phone book. They change other legislation all the time.