Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Isn't 1975, So Why Are We Still Banning Oil Exports?
Forbes ^ | OCT 26, 2015 | Senator Bill Cassidy and Dillon Weber

Posted on 10/29/2015 6:46:57 AM PDT by thackney

In the early 1970s the United States was an oil superpower. Our fields produced over 9 million barrels of oil per day (bbl/d), accounting for more than 15% of the global marketplace. However, our energy consumption at the time still required us to import oil from members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and other nations.

During the Yom Kippur war in 1973 the U.S. supplied arms to our ally and friend, Israel. In retaliation, the Arab members of OPEC placed an embargo on the sale of crude oil to the U.S. and the price for a barrel of oil quadrupled from $3 to $12, creating a broad energy and economic crisis. Families were hard-hit as they coped with long lines to purchase gas, and the economy stagnated. The OPEC embargo was lifted in March of the following year, but decisions made in the aftermath of the crisis are still shaping our nation’s energy policy more than four decades later.

One result was a ban on crude oil exports, implemented in 1975 as part of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The ban was meant to reduce or eliminate our reliance on imported crude oil from the Persian Gulf and to protect against another oil crisis. That ban remains on the books today.

Lifting the oil export-ban would create a 1% rise in GDP

But 40 years later, the dynamics of the American oil industry have changed—as have the relevant political concerns. The export ban is outdated and fails to account for America’s new and expanding energy industry. Domestic crude production has increased dramatically in the past few years: from 5.3 million bbl/d in 2009 to 8.7 million bbl/d today. This has been paralleled by a huge increase in natural gas production due to advances in hydraulic fracturing...

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; export; oil

1 posted on 10/29/2015 6:46:57 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Curse of Carter lives on.


2 posted on 10/29/2015 6:49:03 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Obama doesn’t want us to be a powerhouse at anything.


3 posted on 10/29/2015 6:49:43 AM PDT by Daveinyork ("Trusting government with money and power is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I believe we just swapped some light petrol with Mexico for heavier crude that goes through the Houston refineries better. I think I read it last week in the WSJ.


4 posted on 10/29/2015 6:50:44 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe - Yeb Arbusto es un payaso.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Yes, the Feds finally approved 75,000 BPD swaps with Mexico. We will import their heavy crude and swap it with our light. More than just Houston, many of the Gulf Coast Refineries are optimized for heavy, sour crude. The heavy crude also has more BTU’s per barrel.

Mexico’s Pemex Gets U.S. Crude Swap License for 75,000 Barrels a Day
http://www.wsj.com/articles/mexicos-pemex-gets-u-s-crude-swap-license-for-75-000-barrels-a-day-1446043056

With the light U.S. crude, Pemex said it would increase output of gasoline and diesel and reduce production of fuel oil, increasing its margins. It will also lower the costs of exporting fuel oil from refineries in central Mexico while importing motor fuels.

Alejandro Martinez, who heads Pemex’s industrial division including refining and petrochemicals, said in a conference call with analysts that in addition to raising the value of output, the agreement will have environmental advantages by producing cleaner fuels. “This is great news for us,” he said.

In the first eight months of this year, Mexico imported more than half of the 785,000 barrels a day of gasoline used in the country.


5 posted on 10/29/2015 6:56:26 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Gerald Ford actually, based upon the works Nixon had started.

http://www.ibtimes.com/why-us-bans-crude-oil-exports-brief-history-1562689


6 posted on 10/29/2015 6:57:47 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

One more gift from the (now) second worst president ever... Jimmuh Carter.

I remember gas-lines, and only being able to buy on alternate days. (depending on if your license plate had an odd or even number)


7 posted on 10/29/2015 7:01:27 AM PDT by Mr. K (If it is HilLIARy -vs- Jeb! then I am writing-in Palin/Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Started with Nixon, affirmed by Ford.

Dumb is not limited to Democrats. Big Government Republicans can cause plenty of harm on their own.


8 posted on 10/29/2015 7:07:30 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thank you for the link and the correction.

Do you think it’s time to relax the ban? Or not?


9 posted on 10/29/2015 9:05:16 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Absolutely the ban should go.

The feds should not try to pick winners and losers in the market.


10 posted on 10/29/2015 9:08:42 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

>> The feds should not try to pick winners and losers in the market.

Agree, and that applies to any and all of the market.


11 posted on 10/29/2015 9:11:39 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson