Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

And then aswipe Paul sanctioned the moderators’ rude behavior by allowing them to cut Cruz off.


2 posted on 10/28/2015 7:35:13 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (No more Bushes. W killed the brand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler
That's Paul. Always un-gracious.

When Christie made a similar statement, Cruz could be seen applauding him.

5 posted on 10/28/2015 7:37:04 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Paul could and should have defended Sen Cruz. He chose to pass up a chance to be a true statesman.

Paul may have had a few good answers, but was one of the 3 net losers of the evening (Paul, Bush, and Trump.)

Big winner? Ted Cruz!

.

58 posted on 10/28/2015 9:20:46 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Paul could and should have defended Sen Cruz. He chose to pass up a chance to be a true statesman.

Paul may have had a few good answers, but was one of the 3 net losers of the evening (Paul, Bush, and Trump.)

Big winner? Ted Cruz!

.

59 posted on 10/28/2015 9:20:59 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Paul could and should have defended Sen Cruz. He chose to pass up a chance to be a true statesman.

Paul may have had a few good answers, but was one of the 3 net losers of the evening (Paul, Bush, and Trump.)

Big winner? Ted Cruz!

.

60 posted on 10/28/2015 9:21:37 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Paul could and should have defended Sen Cruz. He chose to pass up a chance to be a true statesman.

Paul may have had a few good answers, but was one of the 3 net losers of the evening (Paul, Bush, and Trump.)

Big winner? Ted Cruz!

.

61 posted on 10/28/2015 9:21:50 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Paul could and should have defended Sen Cruz. He chose to pass up a chance to be a true statesman.

Paul may have had a few good answers, but was one of the 3 net losers of the evening (Paul, Bush, and Trump.)

Big winner? Ted Cruz!

.

62 posted on 10/28/2015 9:22:46 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson