">
Posted on 10/28/2015 11:57:33 AM PDT by Hojczyk
The spending caps that they negotiated with Obama? They've blown those up. The one thing that they won, spending caps, they got rid of them themselves in this deal. I'm trying to understand, are they totally in debt to K Street? Do they all have jobs waiting for them on K Street? It doesn't compute here. Who are these people in the House Republican leadership? What are they? I'll tell you what I've concluded, and it's something that I have forecast before, mentioned before. We've even discussed it on this program.
I think what's going on in Washington right now -- and it isn't new, it's just more visible than it's ever been. I think there's all kinds of bipartisanship going on in Washington. I think there's all kinds of cooperation going on in Washington. I think that it's kumbaya time. I think they are linked arm in arm. I think the bipartisan project is to destroy conservatism. I think they would be happy. They would prefer... I'm talking about the Republican leadership. Not the whole membership, but the Republican leadership.
I have the idea they would be happier with Hillary Clinton as president than Ted Cruz, and that's not a feeling. I know that almost for a fact. I know that with almost ontological certitude. They, as members of the inside-the-Beltway establishment, no way, no how do they want anybody like Ted Cruz in the White House. They would much prefer Hillary. The only thing that explains this, looked at in any kind of prism of common sense, is that there is a combined bipartisan effort to finally render conservatives and conservatism as irrelevant as a pockmark.
(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...
ping
">
Reagan changed it…but the first George Bush tossed it away the first day..all we have now is the total collapse of the country..
That is a good point backed up by facts.
Of course they'd like to destroy conservatism, as we properly understand it today. One of the foundational principles of conservatism is smaller government. And a smaller government would deprive them of power...and that's what it's all about for these clown in both parties. They don't care about the future, they don't care about this country. All they care about is their personal power, perks and privileges. And conservatives and their small government dreams are a direct threat to all of that.
It’s called Strategic Voting.
Canadians figured that out a week back.
Not all of them support Trudeau, but most of them wanted Harper gone. So they were smart enough to realize the way to achieve that was to plunk for Trudeau.
I would vote for the Dem at this point if it were the only way to rid us of a Mitch McConnell or a Lindsey Graham in a leadership position.
Their names will be known in infamy as traitors to their people.
Cruz should have set his sights on Speaker of the House. We need someone who won’t cave. But too many RINOs there oppose him.
I'm pretty sure the Speaker of the House has to be a Representative. Cruz is a Senator.
Nope. You could run.
But 167 Republicans can say they voted against it!
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll579.xml
It’ll probably work too.
All but 29 Republicans ‘voted for the rule’ so the Dems could pass it.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll578.xml
YES!
Good points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.