Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs

You are aware that the first few states are not winner take all. The delegates are divided according to the % of the vote. No one candidate can take 100%
For several sessions the establishment has run several candidates to control the results of the early states. With some of the players dropping out when $$ got low (about time winner take all states began)
Remember the Trump Cruz meeting at beginning? Who says Trump-Carson-Ctuz aren’t beating the establishment at their own game?
That’s the goal beating the establishment. I am rooting for the A team. Mr T and all. Really don’t care how they divide the pie in the early contests as long as they control close to.100% of the outcome with their total accumulative tally

Any attack on any of the three is petty and not constructive so I view those who attack Trump as part of the establishment problem .Same with those who attack Cruz (who I greedily want to serve for life as SC justice)
As for Carson. Hes a nice guy and very intelligent.


128 posted on 10/28/2015 12:27:52 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: hoosiermama; sickoflibs

All primaries before March 15 are proportional representation, including Super Tuesday. (Iowa actually doesn’t pick national convention delegates until May 31st.)

March 15 and forward are mostly winner take all. I still don’t understand why Texas didn’t move the primary to March 15 and make it winner take all. It would be a great way to make a large Republican state have some control.


132 posted on 10/28/2015 12:34:42 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson