Replies

October 25, 2015
FOX faux "News" and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

Chris Wallace, still with his Smart-glasses, begins with Jim Jordan's
support for Ryan.
Jordan: "We agree with him" but notes they did not go along
with his tyrannical demand to remove Jefferson's option
to remove a Speaker.

On to Benghazi.

Some videos from Thursday, mostly favorable to Hillary.
Wallace: Jordan revealed emails which demonstrated
that Hillary KNEW there was a planned attack
"and not a protest",
and then Wallace says to Jordan,
"(You) didn't come up with much new".

Jordan disagrees and explains how Hillary used,
after the al Qaeda attack, "plain language" that was forthcoming to
other world leaders and Chelsea Clinton,
but not to the American people.
Jordan explains how Hillary has been evasive
and these are new and "relevant things".

Wallace, Hillary's defender and lawyer (as he is for Ryan),
cites Hillary's 'victory lap' and Wallace declares that
the Committee did nothing new. Jordan shakes his head "no",
and begins to correct the FOX-"News"-liar.

With clear English, Rep. Jordan removes Wallace's intestines
with the facts.
Wallace will have nothing to do with this, and to minimize it
Wallace says although the emails were the highlight
of the Hearing (demeaning the rest),
Wallace: "Is that all there is"?

Jordan corrects Wallace yet again, and also importantly
explains that Patrick Kennedy's emails have still not been
received, and Amb Steven's emails were only received
"this week".

Wallace ignores that as usual, and drones on to protect Hillary.
Wallace "What did Hillary do wrong"?

Rep. Jordan points out that "Security was not adequate"
and the Congress and people need "more information
(about) ...that terrible night."

Biased Wallace ignores what he says and odiously continues
to defend Hillary. How come she "had to come in (again)"?

Rep Jordan will have none of this nonsense.
Jordan: There has been "no help from the Administration";
and "Why should it take this long to get (the Amb email
only this week)"?

Wallace ignores Jordan's home run and substantive answer,
and does his classic segue to change the subject;
Wallace switches to the DO"J" ignoring the IRS lying to Congress,
attacking political groups, and funding terrorists.
Jordan: "That (coverup by the DOJ) is just flat out wrong."
Jordan then mentions the corrupt IRS targeting, the coverup by Obama,
and continues with clear information, so
Wallace interrupts him.

Wallace: "Is there anything you can do about it?"
Jordan: "Unfortunately I dont think so.
... Someone was involved in criminal activity
and I think it was Lois Lerner"."