Skip to comments.
Wooden Shack in San Francisco Sells for $408,000
NBC News ^
| October 22, 2015
| Gillian Edevane
Posted on 10/24/2015 3:19:09 PM PDT by sparklite2
It appears the old adage holds true: when it comes to real estate, it’s all about location, location, location.
The wooden shack that was on sale for $350,000 in San Francisco’s trendy Outer Mission neighborhood is officially off the market. The deal for the 765-square-foot residence closed on Thursday, with a pair of investors nabbing the property for a cool $408,000, according to Vanguard realtors.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcbayarea.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: biginvestment; sanfrancisco; sf; tinyhouse; woodenshack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Show me the way to go ... broke.
To: sparklite2
It makes a tiny house look humongous.
2
posted on
10/24/2015 3:20:08 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: sparklite2
Yeah, might have to have some lightening hit that sucker.
3
posted on
10/24/2015 3:21:12 PM PDT
by
jocon307
To: sparklite2
4
posted on
10/24/2015 3:21:36 PM PDT
by
tuffydoodle
(Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
To: sparklite2
I can buy a 300 sq foot tiny house for a third of the cost.
Then again, you ARE paying for location in San Francisco.
5
posted on
10/24/2015 3:22:25 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: sparklite2
What part of that was for the land?
6
posted on
10/24/2015 3:22:25 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
To: Graybeard58
7
posted on
10/24/2015 3:23:48 PM PDT
by
Reaganez
To: sparklite2
They call it The Love Shack.
To: goldstategop
I can buy a 300 sq foot tiny house for a third of the cost.
***************************************************************************
One of my sheds, 20X24 cost $4,000 and it has a loft.
9
posted on
10/24/2015 3:24:01 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
To: Graybeard58
The land is valuable. The shack needs to go quite frankly.
You couldn’t pay me to live in it.
10
posted on
10/24/2015 3:24:20 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Graybeard58
What part of that was for the land? All of it. Just my $0.02.
To: sparklite2
Insane, absolutely insane!
12
posted on
10/24/2015 3:25:18 PM PDT
by
teletech
To: goldstategop
Then again, you ARE paying for location in San Francisco. There is a danger that it might be a historic building, e.g. one of the post-earthquake refugee shacks or something...heheh
13
posted on
10/24/2015 3:25:24 PM PDT
by
no-s
(when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote>)
To: no-s
A tiny house can work... I’d take a pass on it.
It looks hideous.
14
posted on
10/24/2015 3:26:27 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Billthedrill
Paid for the land? That’s an interesting thought
inasmuch as the shack cannot legally be moved or
razed. It’s been designated historical, so in theory
the land cannot be used for anything else.
15
posted on
10/24/2015 3:30:45 PM PDT
by
sparklite2
(All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
To: goldstategop
I like it because you just know it really pi$$es off a bunch of liberal snobs
16
posted on
10/24/2015 3:32:05 PM PDT
by
digger48
To: sparklite2
If you can’t use the land, the investors are out $408,000.
That money can buy two good sized homes where I live.
17
posted on
10/24/2015 3:32:05 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: no-s
It is historical. So what they paid so much for is purely location.
18
posted on
10/24/2015 3:32:15 PM PDT
by
sparklite2
(All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
To: sparklite2
SF is an interesting place to visit and see the sights but I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live there.... No sir.
19
posted on
10/24/2015 3:32:53 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
To: sparklite2
I wonder how much they have for renovation.
20
posted on
10/24/2015 3:35:37 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson