[Steve Schulin]

Santorum is a flip-flopper from the get-go. On the one hand he says that unborn children are persons. On the other hand, he supports bills that say it's ok to kill some of those children without due process. None of the big name candidates get this matter (of defending the unalienable right to life) right. In 2012, my presidential vote went to FReeper EternalVigilance. In 2008, I voted for another candidate who I first heard speak at a Free Republic rally during Clinton impeachment era -- Alan Keyes. See a comparison of their perspective vs Santorum's at ProlifeProfiles.com. See the excellent platform of the party that nominated Dr Keyes and Mr Hoefling at America's Party. Let's raise up 435 new House candidates this year that take such a platform seriously

[fatima]

You remind of a purity only Pro-Lifer.If I don’t get 100 percent let me take the dive and lose. Saint John Paul 11 favored picking the most electable Pro-Life candidate.

[Engraved-on-His-hands]

Well, I too voted for both Alan Keyes and Tom Hoefling, so we belong to a very small group indeed. (I supported Rick Santorum in 2012 until he dropped out.) But the website at your link is curious at best. If indeed you despise Santorum for his lack of ardent support for life, then of necessity, according to your chart, this means that you despise even more National Right to Life, Focus on the Family, Phyllis Schlafly and LifeNews, since they are listed on that chart as being even worse than Santorum. Given all of that, exactly whom are you supporting this cycle?