Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

It looks like a “deal” dynamic is going down here.

The question of “what will Trump stand for” is getting the uncomfortable answer of “what Trump negotiates.” Many (though not all) of the questions have no absolute moral answer, but are questions of proportion.

We haven’t had a candidate that operated like that before.

It sounds to me like it has exciting upside possibilities because in making this deal it will pull Trump to look more like an honest plebiscite than career politicians do. But it is going to depend on the people. Those who insist on saying never, ever are not going to have any leverage. Those who say their price is high, might have leverage.


131 posted on 10/21/2015 3:46:17 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I think you make a valid point. Trump is not going to do like Romney and say “hey look at that 47%”. Many freepers including me agreed with Romney. Rather Trump will say to the 47%, what do you want? Do you want to be on the dole for life? Or do you want fresh opportunity. Because trump is the plebiscite candidate. It’s up to the American people to decide what they want.


138 posted on 10/21/2015 3:52:18 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson