‘I couldn’t tell you their position on amnesty since their site doesn’t seem to mention it in an obvious place I can find.’
I’m planning to reply at greater length when I stop laughing so hard I can barely type.
Why do you suppose you can’t find any clue re Club for Growth’s amnesty/border position on their homepage? Border security/anti-amnesty are very popular positions with the conservative base. If CfG supported those positions, why would they hesitate to say so?
This Paul Gosar that you’ve never heard of is a staunch/good conservative. Here is his immigration plank;
‘Immigration and Border Security
There is an immigration crisis in the United States, and the crisis is a failure to secure our border and enforce the Rule of Law.’
Why would Club for Growth have tried to primary him? Why would CfG support Flake who is notoriously open borders?
Look, even CfG’s supporters/defenders admit they are “weak” on amnesty. That is an understatement. CfG is actively seeking an alignment/partnership with the Kochs, and they too are solidly open border.
The principle characteristic of the pro-amnesty/open border crowd is dishonesty. They never admit how anti-sovereign-America they are. This is one reason true conservatives despise them. On top of selling the country out to the Cheap Labor Express, they lie about their position/actions. That makes them scum. Period.