Posted on 10/17/2015 5:37:09 PM PDT by Libloather
Have all the trees gone on strike? Nature sucks.
nowhere in america is pollution going unchecked.
It doesn’t even take climate change.
Some of the historical storms we’ve had in the past, if we had them now, would do much more property damage since there has been so much building on the coast.
So they can predict what will happen to cities inhabited by future generations and we must do something, but giving those same generations massive debt that can only be paid by crippling taxes, well that’s OK.
It seems like accurately predicting next month’s weather day by day should be a snap for these geniuses.
Thanks - I was just going to post the link to that article.
It’s a killer isn’t it?
>>> sea level rise that could submerge land where more than half of today’s population lives.
While I am encouraged by this because those “at risk” cities are all Democrat, the reality is the sea-rise alarm is all a hoax.
Water seeks its own level, and so a sea rise in one place would mean a sea rise across the globe. Yet, I can find late 1600’s survey maps from my tidal-basin area that show the island borders to be essentially indistinguishable from those over 325 years ago. And those island have a max elevation of 3 feet, and so any “sea rise” would have been most definitely noticeable.
CORRECTION: to be essentially indistinguishable from those today
Martha's Vineyard---> ditto
Algore should know.
Tough to follow their map or maybe I’m just impatient. Just let me know when I’ll have to dock the boat a bit further inland.
On the positive side, Arizona will get a seacoast. Future generations will be puzzled by George Strait’s song about ocean-front property in Arizona (where he refers to it as if to something impossible).
On the positive side, Arizona will get a seacoast. Future generations will be puzzled by George Strait’s song about ocean-front property in Arizona (where he refers to it as if to something impossible).
“Water seeks its own level, and so a sea rise in one place would mean a sea rise across the globe. Yet, I can find late 1600’s survey maps from my tidal-basin area that show the island borders to be essentially indistinguishable from those over 325 years ago. And those island have a max elevation of 3 feet, and so any “sea rise” would have been most definitely noticeable.”
Well, you will have to enlist the “wisdom” of Cong. Hank Johnson, (Lawn Jockey, SC) to know if the islands are “in danger of capsizing!”
“>>> sea level rise that could submerge land where more than half of today’s population lives.”
Way cool! I live in the East Bay (that’s SF Bay) at about 250ft above sea level, and I look forward to being able to put in a dock! The other plus would be that the “undesirable element” around here would necessarily be “displaced.” Can Democrats swim?
There is an 1841 tidal benchmark on the Isle of the Dead near Tasmania that shows a 2-1/2cm rise since 1888.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.