Then there’s the fact that the same people that believe that evolutionary science is settled, somehow want to ALSO believe that a gay gene could survive and propagate throughout the species with no means of reproduction.
Now one could say that it could exist but it is so hard to find. If that is the case, evolution tells us that being so ‘hard to find’ means nature has in fact selected it for extinction because it is unfit.
There is nothing but apology, agenda, bad science and propaganda behind the gay gene/born that way issue. It’s behavorial at it’s core. People acting on self harming behaviors are mentally ill.
"Gay" doesn't mean a person is incapable of normal intercourse with a person of the opposite sex.
I think that throughout history, most of the individuals who would now call themselves "gay", did not have such a label available, but did experience these disordered appetites. My impression is that most of them did find opposite-sex spouses and did reproduce. And maybe engaged on homosexual vice on the side, and maybe not.
At least, most of the"famous" gays in history, had normal spouses and did produce offspring. Alexander the Great and all those pederastic emperors who had wives and children; Lord Byron, Oscar Wilde, Gene Robinson, Anais Nin, etc. etc.
From the same people who support the murder of a child but oppose the execution of a murderer.