Replies

I'm no law expert either, but since the law speaks of distinct items, multiple charges may be justified in Hillary's case. It's possible hundreds and possibly thousands of documents, sketches, photographs, maps, lists, ..., were “negligently” kept in a very unsecured form. We may even discover one day that many are even in the possession of foreign governments.

Certainly Hillary Clinton, having more than once publicly demonstrated her lack of expertise in the world of data storage/security, is by no stretch of the imagination qualified to sign off on any system of electronic data/document storage or security.

And by her own admission she is at least guilty of negligence, if not far worse, IMO.

” . . . but since the law speaks of distinct items, multiple charges may be justified in Hillary's case. It's possible hundreds and possibly thousands of documents, sketches, photographs, maps, lists, ..., were “negligently” kept in a very unsecured form. We may even discover one day that many are even in the possession of foreign governments.”

I agree, each incident or violation of title 18 USC 793(f) could, or should be a separate charge, meaning, she could be charged with multiple counts with a possibility of ten years, or a fine, or both on each count.

That could add up to some serious jail time.

Unfortunately, I have this gut feeling, this administration will find a way to extract her from this mess and no charges will be filed against her.