Sounds like Dyson knows his physics.....but little else.
We thank him, however, for his backup on the FACT that climate “scientists” are those who failed REAL physics and math analysis classes in college.
Well he does seem to understand the scientific method or protocols you would use to try and determine the truth of something....
There noting wrong with having a theory of global warming.. that man made release of extra CO2 could cause it...but you have a lot of variables to test and eliminate before you can even begin to start saying you proved it...let alone doing it based on computer models that don't seem to be tracking with observation .
To content you prove your theory true, when really because you are violating proper scientific protocol have not..is a scientific travesty ....
Thing like this... let say for example the earth is in fact warming...that in itself is not proof of man made global waring by CO2....why?...
because you already have document scientific history that that earth goes through natural warming and cooling cycles...you have to eliminate all the known natural variables that impacts Earth's climate before you can even begin to distinguish any impact the new variable ..man released CO2......
to say the earth warming in its self is PROOF of man made CO2.. release is the cause...is like saying the earth geing dark an night is proof that man made CO2 being the cause....