Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CptnObvious
Hillary Clinton views "the law" as her enemy. My concerns lie with the substance of last nights alleged 'debate'.

The candidates uniformly appeared to be running for "candy man" position - bidding for rule to hand out whatever goodies they can scrape up to buy more votes.

Idiots, the lot of them.

Above all, a video clip capturing the dismissive statement Sanders made about HIllary's e-mail scandal...AND...combined with a compilation of media clips capturing the standing ovation & explosive applause from their studio audience, the candidate panel's reaction and media personnel reaction could prove very useful. Such a video clip must be used against any candidate claiming 'transparency' in the coming election.

It's clear with the candidate panel's uniform dismissal of one law applied equally - especially given their support for the BLM movement's demands for inequality/exceptional status, "transparency" does not mean what we think it means.

The candidates last night were clearly running to rule a lawless country...NOT the US as governed under it's sovereign Constitution.

ENOUGH!~

25 posted on 10/14/2015 8:09:55 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wtd
 
 
That's pretty well what I saw too - 5 outlaws publicly discussing how they're going to pull off a heist.
 
 

46 posted on 10/14/2015 9:36:31 AM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson