Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

I’m not sure of the untility of a pure naval interceptor when the chief threats to a CVN’s existence in a major naval war will be submarines and (increasingly) ballistic missiles.

CVNs are great tools for limited wars and keeping sea lanes open. But if the balloon goes up against a nuclear armed opponent it will be the subs that sweep the seas. If the carriers come out at all it will be to mop up.

If I’m right then the carrier fleet’s only utility is in limited regional wars where there really isn’t an aerial threat requiring a pure interceptor.


10 posted on 10/14/2015 4:38:08 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

#10 I think subs too. Subs with many missiles to destroy ships and land targets.


17 posted on 10/14/2015 11:47:52 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson