Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rey
How about calling them the "whiteskins"?

I wonder who would be outraged, and why?

8 posted on 10/12/2015 1:08:09 PM PDT by oldbrowser (The kangaroos have taken over the supreme court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: oldbrowser
I would say 'redskin' already means white people as the only race that gets REAL red skin, is whites, ergo I am highly offended by the term Redskin! Where is my compensation! I am so sick of this racism and oppression against me by the man!


14 posted on 10/12/2015 1:18:17 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 20 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: oldbrowser

Nobody. Even conservatives have subconsciously bought into the rhetoric by using demeaning descriptions of our white skin, such as “pasty white”. It may seem a little insignificant thing, but if only the right understood the power of language and the redefinition of words as well as the left does, they wouldn’t succumb to this mess. I am white, I am pale-complexioned, I don’t tan and don’t try to or want to, and I would never describe my pale complexion as “pasty”. It is the complexion which women for thousands of years tried to have, and it is healthier to boot. If I need to use an adjective for my pale complexion, it will be something like “lily pale” or “magnolia texture” :)


16 posted on 10/12/2015 1:22:06 PM PDT by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson