No one suggested shutting down the roads. The Grizzly Bear corridor exists whether people live there, or not.
The mileage of road closures on U.S. Forest Service land in Montana balloons to 21,951 miles.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3347131/posts
>> No one suggested shutting down the roads.
Your corridor doesn’t exist unless we allow it to exist.
Grizzlies are tools of the left and agenda 21 lovers. They don’t *belong* anywhere. If you are going to make that argument you begin to sound like a wolfpimp. It’s not their land. Property rights matter.
In Washington state they are trying to import grizzlies into the Cascades and the state is balking. For one thing it is against state law. The feds don’t care about breaking state laws. Just wait till all the liberals from Seattle start getting killed by them during the tons of recreational hiking, etc they
do in the Cascades.
The wolves are starting to move into western Wa now too.
Won’t be long before one grabs a kid....I guess the left will be OK with that since humans are evil, they tell me.
Just a final note for you. I have been here a long time and my anti-
liberalism is well proven. Don’t accuse me of being a tree hugger again.
You are in fact the one stating you are on the side of the grizzlies who are a
tool of the Sierra club pukes and agenda 21 lovers. Better look in the mirror before you name call. If I were king, every grizzly and wolf would be dead. I am not a worshipper of biodiversity.
One of my favorite browsing activities is to enjoy the pics of dead wolves from the hunts where they are allowed. Currently on in Idaho I believe. Go hunters. I try to thank each one personally.
Sorry - you are right - this would only not allow new building of roads. Although I imagine that trying to make it sustainable bear habitat they would not be opposed to closing roads.
From an earlier thread:
“....the mileage of road closures on U.S. Forest Service (USFS) land in Montana balloons to 21,951 miles.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3347131/posts