I would guess that you are the type that likes to argue just to argue.
You take issue with the use of certain terminology and try to make them into some great debate.
The point of my post is that the Gun Grabber really have one more hill to take and they will have it all.
Afterwards we can look forward to Registration, Confiscation and history has shown: Annihilation.
And here you are pointlessly carping about the terminology one is using.......
Then you guess wrongly! You've made a gross misrepresentation that needs to be addressed.
You take issue with the use of certain terminology and try to make them into some great debate.
I've taken issue with your, now seemingly intentional, misuse and mischaracterization of a fundamental principle of liberty.
The point of my post is that the Gun Grabber really have one more hill to take and they will have it all.
Fine, make that point. However, you said that the post was for new people...
just entering the fray and so this is for them.
Yet in doing so you're making factually inaccurate statements!
And here you are pointlessly carping about the terminology one is using.......
The essential terminology you are using, which is inaccurate as you're using it.
While it may seem inconsequential to you it is fundamental that proper usage is observed when teaching others about an issue as you claim you want to do.
If a person doesn't know a specific right is a natural right, and immune from government intervention, then they're less likely to care about keeping that right and will allow the government to remove it through legislative dictate not realizing that it isn't in their power to do so.
That's what you're doing with your uninformed, misrepresenting "civil-rights" BS!