Obama was supplying ISIS, so he wasn’t attacking them at all, he is backed by the Muslim Brother Hood.
I’m surprised Tammy ran with this story
“Additional Flexibility”
KA-BOOOOOOM...!
Putin sure had HIM figgered out, huh...?
The ISIS fighters are now in Germany, Austria and France, living off the welfare stares stupid enough to roll out the welcome mats for them. Doesn’t that make them the winners?
Kill the bad guys and get the Hell out. Our boys had no business handing out lollipops to Afghani children or nation-building. Let these people stew in their own feces.
The Russian campaign in Syria seems to have bolstered the Iraqi forces
They are beginning to kick butt
The Russians aircraft should start going into Iraq within a few days
Obama has been pounding them for a year now and was just about to finish then off when the Russians stepped in (cough)
Saw an identical claim last night. It wasn’t true then, it isn’t true now.
Insurgencies, like snakes and cockroaches, take a while to die.
Was somebody counting on a mass Isis based attavk in America, something so big and dastardly, something much much bigger, enough in theory to finally shock America to possibly accept a nationwide gun buyback?
So if Isis is decimated in other places then that must mean a whole lot LESS of muslims will be coming to America.
At first thought, this story is hard to believe. But until the Russians showed up, Islamic State had not been subjected to any serious bombing campaign. Obama’s eight or ten sorties per day, and not all of those dropping their payload, could not have had a significant impact over the large area held by IS.
With the Russians flying fifty or more sorties per day without the absurd rules of engagement US forces are always under, who knows how much damage they might be inflicting.
“The best personal defense is an explosive counterattack.” - Jeff Cooper
“Peace thru superior firepower.” - Anon
Tell that to the Christians that are being crucified or raped/beaten in the streets or shot in the head, or having their throats cut. I think this "ISIS is exaggerated" comes from a group of morally bankrupt individuals who don't have a clue about what ISIS is or how to deal with it...pretending it will just die away because its so crazy. The problem, however, is the 1% of Muslims that actually applaud what ISIS is doing and there are pockets of them all over the world, like a slow eating cancer.
the whole idea that a few morons with some guns and pickups could take and hold entire cities never made any sense.
I could see a group like that conducting a gorilla war using raids and such.
But, no WAY can they EVER take and hold a city unless they are being allowed to.
The second they try to set up shop in a city the whole place would be a target rich environment. Not to mention the convoys moving in the open from city to city with no air protection, again completely vulnerable.
The same people who point fingers at gun violence in America and want to prohibit gun ownership make tons of excuses for Islamonazism and don't want to tackle that issue.