Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Maybe the entire concept of ED is then wrong, and quibbles over when its qualifications are met are just that, quibbles that miss the point.

How about let’s get it banned by constitutional amendment then? Totally?


110 posted on 10/06/2015 6:35:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

It probably should be there for emergency situations. I am not trying to say I’m an expert. I am just saying that taking property from one and giving it to another for the purpose of collecting more taxes is a terribly wrong thing. We should hate eminent domain even in rare instances when it is necessary for public use. But there is no excuse for it when the point is just more tax dollars or even more jobs.

For me it is a similar feeling to the death penalty. It is necessary sometimes but I still hate it. I am for it when necessary, but I will never celebrate it as a wonderful thing. It is always a sad thing. That’s probably not a perfect comparison because there are times when it is hard to not celebrate the death penalty for a particularly evil criminal. Conversely, it is always hard to celebrate the taking of someone’s property for public use even when necessary.


130 posted on 10/06/2015 6:44:58 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson