Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

On the other hand, clouds, particularly at night, prevent heat radiating into space.


22 posted on 10/06/2015 11:06:32 AM PDT by monocle (Kendall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: monocle

[[On the other hand, clouds, particularly at night, prevent heat radiating into space.]]

not so much

Clouds do not cover the entire atmosphere- there is always a vast amount of atmosphere cloud free (and CO2 free for that matter) where heat simply blows righto n out with nothing to stop it- Man’s contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere amounts to just 0.0037% of the total atmosphere- How much heat are we supposed to believe that just 0.0037% of the atmosphere is capturing? Not to mention that this insignificant amount doesn’t even back radiate all that heat, but only a tiny fraction of that piddly amount-

Man, throughout it’s whole history, has produced only 0.00022% of the CO2 that nature has, and nature’s current contribtion of CO2 amounts to just 0.04% of the atmosphere (man’s CO2 is 3.4% of that amount, meaning man’s total CO2 in atmosphere amounts to just 0.0037% of the atmosphere)

All we are really told by climate scientists is basically “CO2 is capable of capturing and back radiating heat, the earth is warmer, there is more CO2 in atmosphere than years ago (There’s actually MUCH less than way back when- but that’s another thread)- and therefore man is causing global climate change”

we are NEVER shown how just 0.0037% of the atmosphere can possibly be capturing enough heat, then back radiating a FRACTION of that captured heat, in an amount large enough to cause ANY changes whatsoever.

We’re NEVER told how even 0.04% of our atmosphere can capture enough outgoing heat

We’re not even told how scant cloud cover and isolated water vapour can do so on a global scale when MOST of the heat blows right on out past what little clouds there are-

If I light a match once a year in an enclosed football stadium, how long will it be before I cause catastrophic ‘climate change’ within that dome? (Or to be more precise, If I were to light enough matches to equal 0.0037% CO2 by volume of air in that dome, how long would it take to cause catastrophic climate change- keeping in mind that the % is not accumulative, )


60 posted on 10/06/2015 12:53:16 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson