Skip to comments.
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS REMOVE UNDER THE DARK OF NIGHT !
TheAmericanMirror ^
| October 6, 2015
| knarf
Posted on 10/06/2015 10:03:11 AM PDT by knarf
I can't believe I'm acftually shaking a little ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: copypaste; oklahoma; thetencommandments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: knarf
If one does not fight this is what happens when degenerates control major institution such as the judiciary. Normal political means will no longer suffice to prevent or reverse the fruits of the leftist assault.
To: sparklite2
Probably Baptist like Westboro.
22
posted on
10/06/2015 10:54:04 AM PDT
by
mykroar
("Never believe anything until it has been officially denied." - Otto von Bismarck)
To: knarf
Criminals do their dirty deeds under the cover of darkness.
23
posted on
10/06/2015 11:05:21 AM PDT
by
bgill
( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: mykroar
It seems to be part of a larger group that is part of the overall Baptist Convention, but they are strong on separation of church and state. From Wiki...
Mainstream Baptists is a network of Baptists in fourteen (U.S.) states that have organized to uphold historic Baptist principles, particularly separation of church and state, and to oppose Fundamentalism and Theocratic Calvinism within the Southern Baptist Convention.
24
posted on
10/06/2015 11:08:04 AM PDT
by
sparklite2
(Eagles fan after loss to Dallas -- This is the first time I ever saw the "prevent offense".)
To: sparklite2
Psalm 119:160
All your words are true; all your righteous laws are eternal.
Good luck to the hellbound trying to steal Gods word.
25
posted on
10/06/2015 11:40:11 AM PDT
by
tflabo
(Psalm 1)
To: knarf
,,,,, that fundamental change Zero promised . Praise Islam ,,, no problem .
26
posted on
10/06/2015 11:53:02 AM PDT
by
Lionheartusa1
()-: ISIS is Islam without the lipstick :-()
To: sparklite2
To oppose fundamentalism, IMO, is antithetical to Baptist theology.
BINO's
27
posted on
10/06/2015 1:49:51 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: knarf
I was raised Southern Baptist and remember differentiating between us and fundamentalists. It’s been sixty years, though, so that could have changed.
28
posted on
10/06/2015 1:59:23 PM PDT
by
sparklite2
(Eagles fan after loss to Dallas -- This is the first time I ever saw the "prevent offense".)
To: tflabo
Jn.3:19b,
"Men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil"
29
posted on
10/06/2015 1:59:37 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: sparklite2
Fundamentalists are essentially ... independent
To be Southern or America (etc.) is to be within and under an organization
I've been independent since 1981
God calls a man, he knocks on doors, starts a church ... and there y'go
Independent, fundamental bible believing Baptist.
30
posted on
10/06/2015 2:02:13 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: sparklite2
Bruce Prescott, a Baptist minister In the same what Al Sharpton is a reverend. They might have the title, just not the Spirit.
To: Yosemitest
To: charlie72
You might need to know this:
Congressional resolution, September 12, 1782, endorsing Robert Aitken's Bible [page 468]
David C. Claypoole, 1782 from the Journals of Congress
The war with Britain cut off the supply of Bibles to the United States with the result that
on Sept. 11, 1777, Congress instructed its Committee of Commerce to import 20,000 Bibles from "Scotland, Holland or elsewhere."
On January 21, 1781, Philadelphia printer Robert Aitken (1734-1802) petitioned Congress
to officially sanction a publication of the Old and New Testament
which he was preparing at his own expense.
Congress "highly approve the pious and laudable undertaking of Mr. Aitken,
as subservient to the interest of religion . . . in this country, and . . . they recommend this edition of the bible to the inhabitants of the United States."
This resolution was a result of Aitken's successful accomplishment of his project.
Aitkens Bible
Aitken published Congress's recommendation of September 1782 and related documents (Item 115)
as an imprimatur on the two pages following his title page.
Aitken's Bible, published under Congressional patronage,
was the first English language Bible published on the North American continent.
"The Bible of the American Revolution"
As long as the United States remained under British rule,
the British government forbade the printing of Bibles in America.
When the Colonies declared their independence,
the importation of Bibles became restricted
and by 1777 there was a severe shortage of Bibles in America.
On September 11, 1777, this shortage of Bibles was brought to the attention of the Continental Congress
by its chaplain, Dr. Patrick Allison.
He said in his report that Bibles were urgently needed because, the use of the Bible is so universal and its importance so great
and on Dr. Allisons advice, Congress passed a resolution
to make every attempt to import 20,000 Bibles in Englishfrom Holland, Scotland, or elsewhere, into the different parts of the Union.
The importation of Bibles soon proved to be nearly impossible
and the Continental Congress had to search for another alternative
to supply the population with their most important book.
On January 21, 1781, the noted colonial printer Robert Aitken petitioned Congress
for both sanction and support for the production of a complete Bible for the American people
and a committee was immediately formed to determine
if Aitken were qualified to produce a book of such significance.
Aitkens impressive credentials (he had, among other things, been the publisher of the Journals of Congress for the first Congress
and published numerous articles by Thomas Paine)
convinced the committee and on September 10, 1782,
a Congressional Resolution was adopted granting Aitken permission and financial support
for the printing of the first edition of the first American Bible.
George Washington, one of the greatest supporters of the Aitken Bible, was so pleased with the result
that he regretted that the Revolutionary troops had been disbanded
before he could provide them with such an appropriate symbol of his gratitude.
Writing to a friend, Washington lamented, "It would have pleased me well,
if Congress had been pleased to make such an important present
(a copy of the Aitken Bible) to the brave fellows,
who have done so much for the security of their Country's rights and establishment."
The printing of the new Bible marked a significant moment in the history of the United States.
More American versions of the Bible soon followed
and, no longer subject to British editions of the Bible, the United States was,
for the first time, able to fully express the freedom of religion held so dearly by the population.
The Aitken Bible was championed by the people
and symbolized a dramatic release from British, and indeed government control,
over their right and ability to worship.
I also found out that the Aitken 1782 Holy Bible was called by Congress the
Also see http://courses.ischool.berkeley.edu/i182ac/s01/third78.html
Although 10,000 copies of the Aitken Bible were printed, the first printing is extraordinarily scarce today.
20th-century estimates place the number of extant copies between 30-40, with possibly five (certainly no more than ten) in private hands.
It is one of the worlds rarest books, significantly rarer than even the Gutenberg Bible.
The photo of the copy to the left is an extraordinarily scarce first edition,
one of approximately 30 known copies (with perhaps only five in private hands),
of the first English Bible printed in America,
the first and only Bible ever to be printed with Congressional approval.
An absolutely extraordinary copy of a most rare and important volume.
33
posted on
10/06/2015 5:32:33 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: knarf
Oklahoma City ... Monday night
Some may remember how Oklahoma City became the capital by raiding the Capital at Edmond and stealing the charter papers. The Capital Building in Edmond I think is now a Masonic Temple.
34
posted on
10/06/2015 11:07:22 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
To: sparklite2
Quot-was erected in 2012, prompting a lawsuit from Bruce Prescott, a Baptist minister from Norman who complained it violated the state constitution.
That minister doesn’t know much about His Kingdom or His Law that will govern His Kingdom..
I would love to see what he thinks 30/60/100 means from the parable of the Sower..
I think it would shock him to see what those numbers represent in the Kingdom..
But that is a wordly minister thinking of this worldly Kingdom and not thinking about His Kingdom..
Feel bad for any flock he shepherds
To: Paul46360
This, like Daley bulldozing trenches into the runways of that Chicago airport is a limited event thats easy to pull of quickly using the element of surprise.
There are over 100 million gun owners distributed across the US. It would take weeks, even months, to launch surprise raids that would scoop up most weapons.
After the first night there’d be no element of surprise. Using this sort of tactic, any sort of tactic, to confiscate guns isn’t going to end well.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson