Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar; LS; catnipman; All

So you consider Wall St. Journal part of the MSM. Well, you may not like AOL either, but they do have a long fairly detailed analysis of many candidates, both parties from weaker to stronger, so Trump and Clinton appear last.

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/10/05/power-rankings-heres-who-has-the-best-chance-at-being-our-next/21244870/


29 posted on 10/05/2015 1:49:06 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin

No, any time you “factor in” all these other subjective things, it becomes meaningless. I could give you a number of things, such as attendance at rallies, amount of money available, free advertising via tv, that would be just as meaningful.


30 posted on 10/05/2015 1:56:29 PM PDT by LS (Sess"Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

As for the NBC/WSJ poll, it`s owned by NBC basically, Chuck Todd stated he from time to time have actually worded the questions

Yes WSJ is absolutely part of the MSM, their editorial is rep establishment, and that is the most conservative part of the paper.

Rupert Murdoch who really is not a Conservative made no changes when he bought it. Most of Murdoch`s media is leftist or MSM

Fox News used to be more Conservative but Rupert just saw a opening there, he may be a fiscal conservative but that`s it

JMO


39 posted on 10/05/2015 5:35:10 PM PDT by Chauncey Uppercrust (TRUMP/CRUZ 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson