Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Russia was “more stable” under Joseph Stalin too but I don’t think it was a good thing.


32 posted on 10/05/2015 7:52:56 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

RE: Russia was “more stable” under Joseph Stalin too

Stable for them, but what about the rest of the world?


35 posted on 10/05/2015 7:59:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity

“Russia was “more stable” under Joseph Stalin too but I don’t think it was a good thing.”

Actually that was the most tumultuous, expansive and aggressive period of the Soviet Union’s existence, but don’t let that stand in the way of a good story.


45 posted on 10/05/2015 8:33:27 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Obamacons: The degenerate and venomous issue born of intimacies between Obama and neocons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity
Russia was “more stable” under Joseph Stalin too but I don’t think it was a good thing.

Ok, so to play "Devil's Advocate" here, what happens if Russia wasn't stable during that period, would we all be speaking German today?

46 posted on 10/05/2015 8:36:12 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson