Skip to comments.
Shocking: New U.S. Army Patch Closely Resembles ISIS Logo
PJ Media ^
| 10-01-2015
| Michael van der Galien
Posted on 10/01/2015 5:37:15 AM PDT by Michael van der Galien
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Michael van der Galien
Why not just post (IMAGE OF PATCH) here?
2
posted on
10/01/2015 5:39:50 AM PDT
by
humblegunner
(NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
To: Michael van der Galien
The picture at pjmedia.com shows a yellow and green badge with MACHETES!! That MUST be the ISIS one....where is the US one?
3
posted on
10/01/2015 5:42:20 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Ann Archy
To: RummyChick
"Traditional army patches before the islamization of the military under Obama: " ~ Geller
To: Michael van der Galien
I believe that's the US Army patch on the left. Some Army brass would have had to sign off on it. Would like to know who it was.
To: Michael van der Galien
Side by side:
7
posted on
10/01/2015 5:45:33 AM PDT
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: Michael van der Galien
I think also the stars should be red in keeping with Obama’s “New Model Army”.
8
posted on
10/01/2015 5:46:01 AM PDT
by
Sooth2222
("In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." - Joseph de Maistre, 1753-1821)
To: Michael van der Galien
Is there any doubt now that enemy sympathizers have seized our government?
9
posted on
10/01/2015 5:46:42 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
(Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
To: RummyChick
I MUCH prefer the look and design of the traditional patches over the new goathumper versions...
To: Mr. Jeeves
To be fair, this is an operational patch. It is only for certain units.
However, it is a ridiculous and offensive patch.
Actually, it might get changed if Muslims get offended. But if US troops are offended - well...we will probably keep it.
To: Michael van der Galien
Not to mention the “UN” style wreath around the border.
This is NOT acceptable!
12
posted on
10/01/2015 5:50:50 AM PDT
by
Fireone
(BLM?.....#NTD (no they don't!))
To: jsanders2001
The patch is specifically for those in Operation Inherent Resolve and only for the Army units and not other branches of the military operating in the campaign.
The only Inherent Resolve Obama has is to destroy America.
To: Fireone
Just noticed that..it is almost a carbon copy. Slight differences but this has to be intentional.
To: Michael van der Galien
If I were still on active duty I would refuse to wear that crap.
15
posted on
10/01/2015 5:54:46 AM PDT
by
rfreedom4u
(Chris Stevens won't be running for president.)
To: Michael van der Galien
And since the patches are similar, in the heat of battle who can be expected to tell the difference?
A convenient excuse for Americans to be killed by ‘friendly fire’.
Cynical, but then again look at who makes the decisions.
16
posted on
10/01/2015 5:56:55 AM PDT
by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
To: humblegunner
OK so the plant branches seem to represent the UN. The three stars for the three branches of Islam and the two swords represent barbarism.
17
posted on
10/01/2015 5:57:15 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: mountainlion
I am trying to find the official insignia for Army troops for Operation Enduring Freedom and came up with this while searching
It does have crossed swords but notice the handles. This was approved in 1989
To: RummyChick
The patch is specifically for those in Operation Inherent Resolve and only for the Army units and not other branches of the military operating in the campaign.
If you wear the same patch then you're fighting on the same team under the same CIC, right?..../s
To: RummyChick
Certainly the artistic/literary convention has been straight swords for Europeans & Westerners, curved swords for Mohammedans.
Let’s face it. The traitors in charge identify more with the Saracens than the Crusaders.
20
posted on
10/01/2015 6:14:20 AM PDT
by
Claud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
