Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Svartalfiar

WRONG.

It counts those 20 and older, not kids.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/record-94031000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-stuck-38-year


41 posted on 09/28/2015 11:49:58 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: TigerClaws
WRONG.
It counts those 20 and older, not kids.


Your link itself mentions 16 and older in the first section, then 20 and older in the second. And why would they cut the numbers at 20? 16 is the generally accepted age to start working. You leave high school at 18. Your link is to an article from some website. If you go to the link I provided in 37, it's straight from BLS, where I don't even see a '20 and above' number used:

The survey excludes people living in institutions (for example, a correctional institution or a residential nursing or mental health care facility) and those on active duty in the Armed Forces. The survey is designed so that each person age 16 and over (there is no upper age limit) is counted and classified in only one group. The sum of the employed and the unemployed constitutes the civilian labor force. People not in the labor force combined with those in the civilian labor force constitute the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years and over.
73 posted on 09/28/2015 3:54:02 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson