Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod

The rationale was that there should be no vote on the Disapproval until after congress had seen all the deals involved as the Corker bill required.
And Obama still refuses to turn over what he calls “side deals”.

Also the Disapproval would be vetoed and fail.


11 posted on 09/28/2015 5:22:36 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

“Also the Disapproval would be vetoed and fail.”

That was always Boner and McConnell’s excuse for not doing anything.


58 posted on 09/28/2015 6:31:30 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith

If we didn’t have the Corker bill, what would the options be for the Congress in opposing the Iran deal?


93 posted on 09/28/2015 12:51:59 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson