That’s because you’re used to the polished smoke and mirrors of today’s high wire politicians. You’re not used to the thinking of the vulgar, but majority crowd.
If this is an example of the "thinking" of the "majority crowd," "vulgar" or not, count me out.
It reads to me like the blustering of someone who doesn't know crap about the subject matter, but wants to cover that ignorance up the best they can.
A candidate for the highest office in the land, the office that bears the title "Commander-in-Chief," doesn't have to give the particulars of every policy, or tell the world everything he may or may not do, but he should be able to communicate to the American people and to the world the principles upon which his actions will be guided.
As with so many other areas of public policy, Trump seems not to have any sort of firm, fixed set of principles to guide him. That's a dangerous recipe for a diffused, arbitrary mish-mash sort of foreign policy. One that is likely to cost far more than we can afford, both in terms of treasure and blood.