A president must take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Our Constitution directly contradicts Sharia Law. Therefore, no Muslim who believes in Sharia Law could protect and defend the Constitution.
Exactly what I’d expect from her. She’s even more pro muslim than obama. At least obama wasn’t lecturing us two weeks after 911 about what a wonderful thing islam is and how they saved the world. (Not to defend obamahe’s still a goat humping miserable p.o.s.)
Ben Carson is a brain surgeon, he should check Fiorina and see if she has one..
Either theses other candidates are hard of hearing, don’t understand the English language or are purposely being obtuse when it comes to Dr Carson’s comments.
Either theses other candidates are hard of hearing, don’t understand the English language or are purposely being obtuse when it comes to Dr Carson’s comments.
imardmd1: Wrong. Anyone willing to defend the Constitution, which tolerates all faiths and prefers none, is tolerated here. Welcomed is another story.
detective: Our Constitution directly contradicts Sharia Law. Therefore, no Muslim who believes in Sharia Law could protect and defend the Constitution.
imardmd1: Correct. Mohammedism, like Communism. consists of a form of government contrary to the United States Constitution, and participation of its adherents in Constitutional processes should be forbidden to those whose allegiance is toward its destruction. That includes Armed Forces, law-making, administration and enforcement, and public education.
On the other hand, ones private thoughts and preferences are ungoverned and ungovernable, out of reach of Constitutional law, and therefore tolerated and tolerable.
Unfortunately, our Chief Magistrate, trained in both Mohammedanism and Communism and preferring both in conducting his office, though professing Christianity, ought to be removed on the basis of the sufferance of both these influences and being engaged in high crimes against the State, in my opinion.
Advancing the interests of Mohammedanism by giving the refuge by offering citizenship to its practitioners and dismissing the requirements of allegiance to the Constitution seems to be a high crime, does it not?
And Carly Fiorina confuses her role as (unsuccessful) executive of a profit-making business with that of the office and limitations as the executive of a free country. (So does Trump, for that matter, while Ted Cruz and Ben Carson do not.)
Corporate PC is more PC than political PC.
The Supreme Court has ruled that no one can become president if his religion does not support the Constitution. Since no real Muslim does, it is cut and dried.
Keith Ellison (D-MN) did and look at his record:
When pro-Islamic organizations are criticized, Ellison often jumps to their defense, traveling the country to raise money on their behalf. In 2009, Ellison spoke at three fundraising dinners for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and provided videotaped remarks at others, including the CAIR-Sacramento Valley dinner last weekend. He also appeared with CAIR officials at events on health care reform and celebrating the Muslim Eid holiday.
Recently, Ellison took to the House floor to rebuke four colleagues who called for an investigation of CAIR and whether it was targeting offices tied to committees on the judiciary, homeland security and intelligence to place interns. According to the book Muslim Mafia, internal CAIR records show the group sought to infiltrate those congressional offices.
Anyone feel comfortable watching the next president demand that he be able to swear on the Koran?
Translation:
Fiorina: Derp derp da derp derp da da derpa derp.
The “no religious test” is totally irrelevant. VOTERS are not restricted by the Constitution. Only the federal government is.
It is to Cruz’s discredit that he brought it up. And Carly is despicable for piling on.
Fiorina doesn’t seem to have grasped what Carson said at all.