Now watch somebody offer the little D-bag a scholarship.
Confronted?
The little shit and his family need to be deported.
Great article. Turn on the light and the cockroaches scatter.
The Truth has always been the exposer of liars and deceivers since the beginning of time. Satan is the father of lies and his children believe them. Time to heap burning coals on the heads of the children of lies and their masters.
Now watch somebody offer the little D-bag a scholarship.
Liberals lie not only because the truth repels them like work repels a Democrat
but because they hope to force you into accepting their lie and therefore becoming complicit in their deceit.
Lying is an exercise of power;
every lie we allow to pass uncontested is a small victory for these cultural trolls.
After this lie came out, hordes of lonely liberals took to social media sharing their hitherto unknown expertise in the detection of Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)
Homeland Security still tells us, “If you see something, say something,”
Maybe DHS could change it’s admonition to, “If you see something, say something, unless it’s a Muslim doing the something, in because if you’re wrong President Fail and his MSM transcriptionists will call you a racist.”
They don't like me much.
I think the one that got me the most was MIT expressing an interest in a kid who can bust the case off a radio shack alarm clock and screw the remains onto a briefcase. Not that taking stuff apart isn’t a 13 year-old past time, but cmon... I think we all know his dad was behind this latest episode of southpark
Another one is #6, "You shall not murder". That one gets to the heart of the Planned Butcherhood wickedness and scorning of God's Law.
It’ll really get interesting if that new Facebook “dislike” button deletes posts after 10 dislikes, as some are saying it will.
The political wars on FB will go thermonuclear. Expect to see Conservative attempts to spread the truth get attacked and removed in a highly organized manner.
We need to be ready for this. And to respond in kind.
I wonder what would happen to me if I brought a homemade clock on a White House tour?
No wonder Hillary is making a central plank of her platform changing the Constitution to allow her to make it a crime to be critical of her.The link is to a discussion of Campaign Finance “Reform.” The discussion of Citizen’s United depends on a distinction between electronic (TV, Cable) and paper-and-ink idea propagation. The central fallacy is that “the Constitution didn’t discuss any technology other than the printing press.” But that is a naively literal reading:
It is not true that the Constitution is reactionary; the Constitution anticipates and forwards progress. TV, Cable - actually, all electronic communication technology, including the internet - is simply the playing out of the logic of the Constitution itself.
- Article 1 Section 8. :
- The Congress shall have power . . . To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries . . .
does not establish a ceiling over the rights of the people. Rather, as
- Amendment 1:
- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
makes plain, the First Amendment is to be understood only as a floor under our right to express ourselves. Money is not speech, but it is undeniable that nobody can have freedom of the press if he cannot freely spend his own money on ink, paper, printing presses, and any other technological means which reflects “the progress of science and useful arts” applied to the problems which the literal printing press address.
- Amendment 9 :
- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
"Campaign Finance Reform” is an abuse of our rights, and should be challenged in court. There is at present a 5-4 majority on SCOTUS to uphold the truth. It is a disgrace that any “CFR” law was ever passed, let alone been upheld in the courts. If there is a real requirement for reform, Article V is the answer - not for the people, but for the government to undertake.
Excellent article.