“........Ultimately, the NLRB’s decision advances a few special interests while endangering 770,000 franchise businesses and countless firms that use outsourcing, which adds up to 8.5 million employees and temporary staff.”
—
So is this ruling bad for companies which outsource?
I’m all for it, if that is the case.
America needs to stop chasing jobs to foreign countries.
No, this ruling creates the liberty of markets. The NLRB are pro-union central planners. Conservatives are against central planning.
Now, in as much as outsourcing is legal and economically good, it will have no negative effect on outsourcing.
Your issue is off shoring and this change will be part of the regulatory relief that will make American businesses more competitive with their foreign rivals. Isn’t that what you want?
Read the article.
If you’re all in for Obama’s NLRB ruling, you’re on the wrong site.
It won’t affect outsourcing as the Dept. of Labor has no jurisdiction in India.
It will affect onsite temping like Kelly Girl. Their temp employees will now be deemed jointly employed by Kelly and their client. This leaves their client with all of the liability and not all of the control.
Speculation is employers will ditch temp services and automate even further.