Posted on 09/17/2015 7:12:13 AM PDT by statestreet
A group of neutral observers almost unanimously agreed Thursday night that Donald Trump fared poorly in the second Republican presidential debate. The big winners in the eleven-candidate extravaganza, most felt, were Carly Fiorina and Chris Christie.
Most in the group also gave high marks to Marco Rubio, for his grasp of foreign policy.
Several, however, noted that Trump thus far has not been hurt in polls by bad performances and cautioned against “instant analysis” of the CNN-sponsored show-down at the Reagan Presidential Library.
My group included pundits, an historian, a pollster, and political consultants.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
My apologies for calling you drunk on Trumpaid and a moron. But you are dead wrong on Rubio and scientific polling will bear that out.
Thank you for that. I don’t think you and I have ever had cross words in the almost 17 years we have both been here.
I just did not see anything exceptional about Rubio last night.
Truthfully, his sellout to amnesty will prevent me from ever seeing him objectively.
And Reagan's adopted son Michael seems happy that it's dead, especially since it won't protect Trump, whom Michael wants to defeat.
Might as well lock & load, and await the Apocalypse.
I’m 67, with a bad heart. Bring on the s*** and may I be privileged to die on my feet with weapon in hand. Screw it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.