[Carry_Okie]

Your snarkiness is duly noted and not appreciated.

It was not snarky; it was deeply critical. I offered you three books detailing a history with which you are clearly unfamiliar, documenting that the destruction of our social order through public education was an intentional on the part of the extremely wealthy tax-exempt foundations of primarily Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller. I then offered an article I have written as to what to do about it. You clearly chose to ignore it all. So I busted you on it using a metric that goes to the heart of you being an educator, that you are unwilling to educate yourself, lacking even the curiosity to search those links.

It's true. Wear it proudly. Two of those books are published online free by they way as an act of public service despite the fact that they are very successful authors.

I home educated my girls. It took me LESS time to educate them at home than did dealing with their stupid private school teaching the same methods that have destroyed public education. One became valedictorian of her college at the age of barely 20, the other transferred to Stanford and is now a PhD candidate in a top tier program.

[EnigmaticAnomaly]

While I applaud the success of your homeschooling efforts, it has become wholly apparent that the two of us have an irreparable disconnect insomuch as our individual arguments are concerned. I have also grown tired of your thinly veiled air of superiority (whether perceived intellectual acuity or otherwise) implied in your responses.

That being said, I shall refrain from employing ad hominem in my response, either explicit or implicit, and simply end this colloquy.

Good day, kind sir.

-EA